I showed up the Pressure Vessel Handbook (10th Ed) Eugene F. Requested the justification from a published document, interpretation based on research, adopted in practice etc. This approach discards the respect for those users from small companies and also goes against engineering design principles and professional ethics. There is discrimination against small companies.įor engineering design and technical issues, the requirements from major customers go beyond the engineering design principles themselves. PVE is to selectively treat customer requests according to the size the customer (the majority of users). is to use the ASME or Code based computed allowable stress. However, to the best of my knowledge, the general expectation from the vast majority of users, Notified Bodies etc. I agree that the allowable skirt stress could be based on design rules from AISC or equivalent.
The answered from the development engineer: Subject (revised): The skirt allowable stress shall be in accordance with AISC or equivalent, not ASME pressure vessel code. Please allow me simply to state the case 00196823 here and welcome all to comment.
This may help you to understand what the after-sale service provided by PVE Lite support team is currently. If you are interested, please go to PPM Smart Community (you shall be a listened PVE Lite user). I have another unpleasant experience with PVE lite and the support team working recently.
0 kommentar(er)
